![]() ![]() You have a choice between an 18mm strap (104g) and the thicker 23mm band (124g). The leather version of the Moto 360 is the lightest model available at 49g. The soft leather didn't cause any irritation or leave marks, and the simple buckle made it easy to put on and take off. We found the Moto 360 to be the more comfortable to wear. Winner: Moto 360 - The Motorola watch looks beautiful - combining the classic look of a watch with the high-tech functionality and a robust chassis. Like the Moto 360, the Gear S is also IP67 rated. It's well-made too, with the screen surrounded by a metallic frame and Gorilla Glass used for the display. Meanwhile, the Gear S has a curved rectangular screen, giving it a futuristic look. Crucially, it's also certified to be water resistant (IP67) so you don't have to worry about taking it off every time you wash your hands or take a shower. Motorola has used brushed aluminium for body, and it's available with either a leather or metallic strap, so the 360 oozes quality. The Moto 360 uses a circular clock-face design giving it the look of a traditional watch. We take a look at how the devices compare in all the key areas: Motorola has set an early benchmark from a design standpoint, whereas Samsung has attempted to pack as many features in as possible. If you're thinking about buying a smartwatch, two of the most prominent options on the market are the Moto 360 and Samsung Gear S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |